Producer’s Liens: Enforcement Issues

by René Lastreto II1

I. Nature of the Lien

The Producer’s Lien is a California statutory lien. The lien is upon “any farm product” and upon all processed or manufactured forms of such farm product securing the producer’s labor, care and expense in growing and harvesting the product.2 “Farm products” are essentially all agricultural products of the soil and includes honey and beeswax, oil seeds, poultry, poultry product, livestock product and livestock for immediate slaughter.3 Timber, timber products, milk, milk products and aquacultural products are excluded.4

The lien is in favor of every producer of farm products that sells the product grown by the producer
to any processor under either an express or implied contract.5 A “producer” is a person engaged in the business of growing or producing farm products.6 An Illinois Bankruptcy Court construing California law, In re S.N.A. Nut Co. 197 B.R. 642, 652(B.CT.N.D. Illinois, 1996) has held that a California processor could assert a Producer’s Lien as to products it may grow. In SNA Nut Co., supra the Debtor attempted to defeat the California Producer’s Lien by arguing that since the party asserting the lien (in that case Tulare Nut Company) was also a processor, it was precluded from asserting the lien. The Court denied summary judgment on that issue finding an issue of fact as to the extent of product delivered by Tulare Nut Company to the Debtor that was actually grown byTulare Nut Company. Id.

[Read more...]

  1. Rene Lastreto, II is an owner shareholder at Lang, Richert & Patch, Attorneys at Law, a
    Professional Corporation. He has 30 years of experience in representing all contingencies in the
    loan enforcement process including lenders, bankruptcy trustees, borrowers, equipment lessors
    and others. His practice is in all Courts including the Bankruptcy Courts, Federal Courts and
    California Superior Courts. He is certified in the area of Creditors Rights Law by the American
    Board of Certification.
  2. California Food and Ag Code § 55631.
  3. California Food and Ag Code § 55403.
  4. Id.
  5. California Food and Ag Code § 55631.
  6. California Food and Ag Code § 55408.

Issues in Enforcing California Dairy Cattle Supply Liens

by René Lastreto II1

I. Introduction

The Dairy Cattle Supply Lien law in California provides for a statutory lien know as a “Dairy Cattle Supply Lien” in favor of those who provide feed or material (a defined term) to aid in the raising or maintaining dairy cattle.2 The Dairy Cattle Supply Lien was added to the Food and Agricultural Code in 1987. Other than very minor amendments to conform with certain provisions the Commercial Code, the law remains as originally drafted. While there are no reported cases construing the law, certain issues have arisen in various bankruptcy cases dealing with enforcement of the lien law. Generally, two of the primary financing constituencies in a dairy bankruptcy case are a traditional lender and grain suppliers. In addition to the substantial defaults facing the traditional lender, grain suppliers often have large balances owed at the time of the petition is filed. Most grain suppliers are sophisticated enough to have filed Dairy Cattle Supply Liens with the Secretary of State.

[Read more...]

  1. Rene Lastreto II is an owner shareholder at Lang, Richert & Patch, Attorneys at Law, a Professional Corporation. He has 30 years of experience in representing all contingencies in the loan enforcement process including lender, bankruptcy trustee, borrowers, equipment lessors and others. His practice is in all Courts including the Bankruptcy Courts, Federal Courts and California Superior Courts. He is certified in the area of Creditors Rights Law by the American Board of Certification.
  2. California Food and Ag Code § 57402.

Fresno Attorneys receive 2010 Super Lawyer and Rising Star Honors

Lang, Richert & Patch is proud to recognize its 2010 Super Lawyers and Rising Stars. Every year, the San Francisco publication, Law and Politics puts together a listing of outstanding lawyers in more than seventy practice areas. These attorneys are recognized for their uncompromising work and professional achievement. Only upon being nominated by their peers and evaluated by an independent source in a multi-phase process, do attorneys qualify for Super Lawyer honors. Top up-and-coming attorneys in the state who are 40 years old or younger, or who have been practicing for 10 years or less, and who are peer nominated and reviewed may qualify for Rising Star honors. Only 5 percent of lawyers in each state make the published list of Super Lawyers while no more than 2.5 percent are named as Rising Stars.
[Read more...]

“Women Helping Women” Luncheon A Great Success!

By Ana de Alba
Board member, Fresno County Women Lawyers

A call to action heard loud and clear in the legal community was answered last month during the Fresno County Women Lawyers’ “Women Helping Women” luncheon. The luncheon featured speakers Jenny Bates, Director of The Hacienda Drug/Alcohol Rehabilitation Center for Women and Deborah Torres, Director of Samaritan Women. The speakers shared stories of how their organizations help women who have been incarcerated get back on their feet. Those attending the luncheon were asked to donate career clothing, toiletries, postage stamps, and bus tokens to help these wonderful organizations improve the lives of the women they serve. Generating donations for both organizations, FCWL members took up the call to action and made the luncheon an amazing success.

[Read more...]

A Trend Toward Harmonizing Reasonable Accommodation and Interactive Process Claims Under the FEHA and ADA?

Nadaf-Rahrov v. Neiman Marcus Group, Inc., et al.: A Trend Toward Harmonizing Reasonable Accommodation and Interactive Process Claims Under the FEHA and ADA?

The Court of Appeal for the First Appellate District in Nadaf-Rahrov v. Neiman Marcus Group, Inc., et al. (Sept. 10, 2008, Cal. Ct. App. 1st) __ Cal.App.4th __ [2008 DJDAR14314] held the federal definition of “reasonable accommodation” applies to disability-based discrimination claims under California’s Fair Employment and Housing Act, Government Code section 12940 et seq. (the “FEHA”), perpetuating a split among California Courts of Appeal regarding the scope of protections available under the FEHA to qualified disabled workers.  The following holdings are of particular significance.

[Read more...]

Are You In Compliance With The New California Foreclosure Laws?

In an effort to “help even more Californians keep the American Dream of homeownership alive,” Governor Schwarzenegger signed SB 1137 into law on July 8, 2008. Taking full effect on September 6, 2008, the new laws have implications for lenders and borrowers alike.

[Read more...]

The Benefits and Perils of Hiring from Competitors

By Scott J. Ivy
Lang, Richert and Patch

Regardless of the industry, almost every business has been faced with an increasingly common dilemma. Your star salesperson or employee, to whom you have devoted significant amounts of time and money training and developing, suddenly announces he or she is leaving to join a direct competitor. Will your customers follow? Will the employee divulge your confidential information in an attempt to lure his or her former customers to his new firm? The hiring company faces similar issues. Will the employee’s former customers follow him or her to your business, a key issue given that you have likely agreed to pay a sizable salary or bonus with the expectation that is exactly what will occur. Will the former employer sue, thereby preventing those very customers from transferring their business and/or at the very least tie your company up in expensive litigation for the next several years? Unfortunately, as many companies learn too late, whether or not the former employer can successfully prevent the new employer from “stealing” these customers is often set in stone by the time litigation is commenced.

[Read more...]